It was too hot. My mind could not function. Things, events and concepts became out of focus. It was just like wearing the wrong pair of glasses from your super-myopic-and-ugly classmate in high school. No matter how hard you strained your eye muscles, or strained my neurons, I could only figure out blurred images. I could barely distinguish a deer from a horse, provided that they were near enough, and not in any disguise.
I did not know how long this
condition would last. I told myself,
that summer would go away, followed by winter. This was the weather of Hong Kong, the old
Hong Kong we knew. The old Hong Kong we
studied in high school geography. After
a few months, it would not be equally hot. My mind would clear up then. I told myself, repeatedly.
At the back of my out-of-focus
mind was my presbyopia. It did not get
better after several summers. It only
got worse month by month. Suppressing
the memories of the good old days when I painted at ease the moustache of a
1:72 soldier, I got a pair of reading glasses. I wore shirts more often so that I could keep
and retrieve the glasses at the breast pocket more conveniently. I gave up paper-backs and got a kindle. It was a reading device without back-lit. It strained the eyes less. Most importantly, the fonts could be adjusted
to an unbelievably large size. I had to
live with it. I have to live with the
presbyopia.
While there were well
documentation and statistics for reflective errors, I did not think there was
any formal measurement and study on blurring of mind. I had estimated that in my 25 years’ practice,
I should have seen around 100,000 patients and relatives in more than 300,000
consultations. It was quite alarming
that I had an impression that a significant proportion of them got blurred
minds. Of course there was no objective
measurement. And it was not fair to
assess them when they were physically sick and mentally preoccupied by their
illnesses. So I just quote some examples
and readers could try to figure out what I meant. A university student applied some cream of
unknown ingredient and unknown origin to his finger with cellulitis and was
quite curious why the condition got worse. A financial consultant tried 4 years, in vain,
to control his sky high cholesterol level with various methods he learnt from
discussion forum. A teacher refused to
give antibiotics to her daughter with scarlet fever because she knew that
antibiotics were not good. A businessman
refused to take antihypertensive medicine because he was sure that once
started, treatment could not be stopped. A shop manager, agreed with her insurance
agent, thought that it was the duty of doctors to find out some means for her
to claim insurance for accidental injury that she did not suffer. An accountant educated me that it was patients’
rights to have regular sick leave 2 days per month. A barrister was offended because I charged her
consultation fee for writing a referral letter.
I planned to go on and filled the
whole page with examples. It was so
reassuring that I was not the lone ranger here. Out of focus, I saw no difference in the
survey results between those supported and those voted against the Government
Proposals for Selecting the Chief Executive by Universal Suffrage. Afterall, when this Editorial reaches our
members, the outcome would have been determined. Frankly, how many people know exactly the
details of the Proposals? How many people
can elucidate the pros and cons hidden between the lines? I agreed totally with the tycoons that most
people in Hong Kong cared more about earning money than who was going to be the
next Chief Executive.
Nonetheless, how come nearly
7,000 members responded to our survey? How
come tens of thousands of citizens made history by staying on the street for 80
days? How come students stood firm
against police batons? How come people
took all the trouble, risking being charged criminally, to nail the
state-of-art banner on the Lion Rock Hill? I did not know the answer. I do not know the answer. And I will not know the answer. With clouded mind, I tried to make a guess. It was not because of the Basic Law. It was not about the 831 decision. It was not about the Proposals. It was all about the way it was handled. In the battle between David and Goliath the
giant, if Goliath repeatedly hit below David’s belt, what would happen?
The weather is still hot. My mind is still out of focus. Politics are difficult to understand and
taboos to write on. It must be the
weather that caused my mind to drift to the survey and the Chief Executive
Election. It must be the weather that caused
me to write on this topic. Or, is it now
the only moment that my mind is clear enough to see the real nature of my
all-along-clouded mind?
(Source: HKMA News June 2015)
沒有留言:
張貼留言